Akwa Ibom Elders Seek Probe Into Election Petitions Judgments
The Akwa Ibom State Elders have called for probe into what they described as contradictory judgements in the election petitions.
In a statement, they expressed concerns over “the clear cases of
miscarriage of justice in nearly all of the decided cases so far.”
The statement was signed by leaders of the Uyo Elders Forum, Otuekong
Jackson Udoh, Obong Rita Akpan,former minister, Dr Ime Okopido, former
minister and Professor Okon Eminue, former chairman, Governing council
of Akwa Ibom State University.
“Our concerns are based on the fact that if the election petitions
were
determined on merit, the judicial decisions would have been consistent with the demands of justice. It is worthy of note that the European Union, the American government, African Union and local election monitors all condemned the conduct of the polls in Akwa Ibom and Rivers states.
determined on merit, the judicial decisions would have been consistent with the demands of justice. It is worthy of note that the European Union, the American government, African Union and local election monitors all condemned the conduct of the polls in Akwa Ibom and Rivers states.
“In a unanimous verdict, the representatives of the international
community that monitored the elections stated categorically that
elections as known to Nigerian laws did not take place in both Akwa Ibom
and Rivers states”.
The group noted that: “Local security reports on the elections in
both states equally stated that the said elections were substantially
marred by irregularities and violence. Most of the judicial decisions on
the Akwa Ibom election petitions and appeals ignored the position of
the international community on the polls. But the world cannot be wrong.
The judges and justices that handled the election petitions and appeals
in Rivers State agreed with the international community. Why is the
Akwa Ibom case different?”
“For instance, during the governorship election petition, evidence
was led before the tribunal to establish a case of over voting where
1,222,836 votes were recorded by Akwa Ibom State INEC as against INEC
headquarters Card Reader data which showed that only 437,128 voters were
accredited to cast ballot in the governorship election. The voters’
register also showed a lower figure of 448, 307 as having been
accredited to vote in the election.
“It is just not possible for 437,128 voters, going by the Card reader
figure (or 448, 307, according to the voters’ register) to cast
1,222,836 votes. Section 53 of the Electoral Act 2010, as amended,
provides for the cancellation of elections where there are incidents of
over voting. By failing to cancel the entire governorship election in
Akwa Ibom State, the election petition tribunal ignored the clear
provision of the law for the conduct of the election”.
“We want to highlight another instance of breach of the provision of
the Electoral Act in the adjudication of the election petitions in Akwa
Ibom State with respect to over voting. In Akwa Ibom North West
Senatorial District (Ikot Ekpene Senatorial District), where both the
election petition tribunal and the Court of Appeal upheld the election
of the Senate Minority Leader, Chief Godswill Akpabio. The number of
votes cast in the election, which stood at 450,000, according to INEC
records, far exceeded the number of registered voters in the entire
senatorial district, which stand at 205,000 in INEC record.
“The courts equally overlooked the unambiguous fact that Senator
Akpabio was not presented by his party for election in Akwa Ibom North
West Senatorial District, where he was declared elected, and
rationalised that the nomination of Akpabio for election in a different
senatorial district other than where he was declared winner was a minor
error that was erased. We invite the world to look at the contrary
decision in a similar case in Taraba State, where it was decided that
the PDP candidate for the election, who is now the state governor, could
not be returned elected because he was not validly nominated by his
party due to a similar irregularity in his nomination process.
“Votes for the PDP candidate in the election were regarded as wasted
votes because he was not validly nominated. Why was the law applied
differently in the case of Akwa Ibom North Senatorial District”, they
said.
They therefore called on President Muhammadu Buhari to come to their
sid by instituting a judicial commission of enquiry into the
adjudication of all the election petitions and appeals that resulted
from the elections held in Akwa Ibom State on 28 March 2015 and 11 April
2015.
“The good people of Akwa Ibom State demand to know why the Judiciary
treated election cases emanating from their state completely differently
from similar cases in Rivers and Taraba states”, they added.
Source: Sun News Online

No comments:
Post a Comment